Debate with Steve Easterbrook
We explore the mutual incomprehension across the climate emails divide
We explore the mutual incomprehension across the climate emails divide
Science and humanities students view each other with incomprehension: blame our dumb, narrow schooling.
In fighting for science, we subscribe to a comforting illusion: that people can be swayed by the facts.
The funding for academic research has been taken over by business
David Bellamy’s at it again, with even dafter claims about climate change.
Matt Ridley raged against the government - until he needed £16 billion
It’s happening, it’s systematic, and it is precisely the opposite story to the one the papers are telling.
It doesn’t give a damn about whether the facts stack up - as long as it creates a controversy. Read more »
The tobacco industry duped both academic journals and the media.
Darwin tells us that we are no more than assemblages of complex molecules. We should celebrate this.
Climate change denial, as David Bellamy’s claims show, is based on pure hocus pocus
The biotech companies want us to consider everything except their motives.
Read more »
The conflicts of interest revealed by the MMR story are everywhere.
Read more »
Nothing damages science more than forcing researchers to develop GM
Read more »
We Need a Revolution in our Universities
Read more »
Early specialisation prevents scientists from understanding the consequences of their work
Read more »
Some of Britain’s most eminent scientists are engaged in an economic war against the poor
Read more »
Scientists are being forced to work for corporations, and against the rest of us
Read more »
Science with Scruples
Read more »
Genetic engineering will transfer power from the poor to the rich
Read more »
Reductionism is making science ever less relevant to our lives.
Read more »
The extraordinary work of the neurobiologist Antonio Damasio shows that wisdom is inextricable from emotion
Read more »