Scot Free

Why would Scotland wish to be tethered to the political wasteland south of the border?

By George Monbiot, published in the Guardian 15th March 2017

Here is the question the people of Scotland will face in the next independence referendum: when England falls out of the boat like a block of concrete, do you want your foot tied to it?

It would be foolish to deny that there are risks in leaving the United Kingdom. Scotland’s economy is weak, not least because it has failed to wean itself off North Sea oil. There are major questions, not yet resolved, about the currency it would use, its trading relationship with the rump of the United Kingdom and its association with the European Union, which it’s likely to try to rejoin.

But the risks of staying are as great or greater. Ministers in Westminster are already trying to reconcile us to the possibility of falling out of the European Union without a deal. If this happens, Britain would be the only member of the G20 nations without special access to EU trade: “a very destructive outcome leading to mutually assured damage for the EU and the UK”, according to the Commons foreign affairs committee. As the government has a weak hand, an obsession with past glories and an apparent yearning for a heroic gesture of self-destruction, this is not an unlikely result.

On the eve of the first independence referendum, David Cameron exhorted the people of Scotland to ask themselves “will my family and I truly be better off by going it alone? Will we really be more safe and secure?” Thanks to his machinations, the likely answer is now “yes”.

In admonishing Scotland for seeking to protect itself from this chaos, the government applies a simple rule: whatever you say about Britain’s relationship with Europe, say the opposite about Scotland’s relationship with Britain.

In her speech to the Scottish Conservatives’ spring conference, Theresa May observed that “one of the driving forces behind the Union’s creation was the remorseless logic that greater economic strength and security come from being united.” She was talking about the United Kingdom, but the same remorseless logic applies to the European Union. In this case, however, she believes that our strength and security will be enhanced by leaving. “Politics is not a game and government is not a platform from which to pursue constitutional obsessions,” she stormed, to which you can only assent.

A Conservative member of the Scottish parliament, Jamie Greene, complains that a new referendum “would force people to vote blind on the biggest political decision a country could face. That is utterly irresponsible.” This reminds me of something, but I can’t quite put my finger on it. Before the last Scottish referendum, when the polls suggested that Scotland might choose independence, Boris Johnson warned that “we are on the verge of an utter catastrophe for this country. … No one has thought any of this through”. Now, as foreign secretary, he assures us “we would be perfectly OK” if Britain leaves the EU without a deal.

The frantic attempts by government and press to delegitimise the decision by the Scottish First Minister, Nicola Sturgeon, to call for a second independence vote fall flat. Her party’s manifesto for the last Scottish election gives her an evident mandate: it would hold another referendum “if there is a significant and material change in the circumstances that prevailed in 2014, such as Scotland being taken out of the EU against our will.”

Contrast this with Mrs May’s position. She has no mandate – from either the general election or the referendum – for leaving the single market and the European customs union. Her intransigence over these issues bends the Conservative manifesto’s pledge to “strengthen and improve devolution for each part of our United Kingdom”. Her failure to consult with the governments of Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland before unilaterally deciding that the UK would leave the single market, and her refusal to respond to the paper the Scottish government produced, exploring possible options for a continued engagement with Europe after Brexit, testify to a relationship characterised by paternalism and contempt.

You can see the same attitude in the London-based newspapers. As the last referendum approached, they treated Scotland like an ungrateful servant. “What spoilt, selfish, childlike fools those Scots are … They simply don’t have a clue how lucky they are,” Melanie Reid sniffed in the Times. Now the charge is scheming opportunism. “We hope the Scottish people call Sturgeon out for her cynical, self-interested game-playing,” rages the Sun’s English edition. If you want to know what cynical, self-interested game-playing looks like, read the Sun’s Scottish edition. It says the opposite, contrasting the risks of independence with “the stick-on certainty of decades of Tory rule with nothing to soften it,” if Scotland remains within the UK.

Whenever I visit Scotland, I’m reminded that Britain is politically dead from the neck down. South of the border, we tolerate repeated assaults on the common weal. As the self-hating state destroys its own power to distribute wealth, support public services and protect the NHS from ruin; as it rips up the rules protecting workers, the living world, our food, water and the very air we breathe, as disabled people are pushed off a cliff and the poor are evicted from their homes, we stand and stare. As the trade minister colludes with the dark money network on both sides of the Atlantic, threatening much that remains, we shake our heads then turn away.

Sure, there are some protests. There is plenty of dissent on social media, as bold as it is futile, but our response is pathetic by comparison the scale of what we face. The Labour opposition is divided, directionless and currently completely useless.

But north of the border, politics are everywhere, charged with hope, anger and a fierce desire for change. Again and again, this change is thwarted by the dead weight of Westminster. Who would remain tethered to this block, especially as the boat begins to list?

Scotland could wait to find out what happens after Brexit, though it is hard to see any likely outcome other than more of this and worse. Or it could cut the rope, pull itself back into the boat, and sail towards a hopeful if uncertain future. I know which option I would take.